
Got my hands on another old wooden puzzle, are you surprised? It’s a lovely image, but there were so many missing pieces! I went into this knowing there were only 499 pieces, but I mistakenly assumed that meant there was only one missing piece. I was wrong of course. This puzzle apparently started out with 510 pieces, not 500. Still, mom and I had a good time putting it together and that’s what counts.
There is such beautiful detail in the artwork, the hands seem almost photo quality. It was a beautiful puzzle and mom and I enjoyed it even with the many missing pieces.
EBL 1920 – I wish I knew if that was in reference to the date the puzzle was cut or if it’s when the image was painted. It could be both, actually.
I’ve got one more old puzzle yet to assemble and one more in the queue, but unless I find something amazing I’m done with the vintage/antique puzzles. Not because this one had lots of missing pieces, but because either fortunately or unfortunately (I’m not sure which), the municipal building puzzle was so amazing, and such fantastic quality that I feel that everything else is a bit of a letdown. Even if it’s great quality it still isn’t as good. I was so lucky to find that puzzle; it’s a one of a kind, exceptionally well made, and mom and I enjoyed the journey of putting it together so much – it just can’t be matched or duplicated. Nothing even really comes close.
I’ve told hubby to stop sneakily buying these old puzzles on eBay. He purchased a few for me as a surprise, it’s very sweet but I’d prefer it if he didn’t do that anymore. I think I’d rather be happy we had the experience and fun of assembling a very rare and wonderful antique than be let down by the not up to snuff quality of lesser (but still lovely) puzzles.
This is adorable! I found the painting, it’s from 1920: https://www.artuk.org/discover/artworks/the-wedding-register-188739 I was surprised to see that 1920 is the date of the painting, because I think the clothes put the scene more in the 19th Century, but then again the artist was born in 1852.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Nicola! EBL is Edmund B. Leighton!
LikeLike
I can see W, U and N as whimsies, are there any other letters?
LikeLiked by 1 person
F, C, and Z were there too. I was hoping it would spell something, but no luck. 😉
LikeLike
Too bad, that’s what I was hoping as well 🙂 It must mean something, but I guess we’ll never know.
LikeLiked by 1 person